The Goldy Dossier

Trump should get a law firm to commission a commercial research and strategic intelligence firm [to hire a foreign agent] to create the Gold dossier that proves....
A) Obama and Holder knew, approved and authorized the Fast and Furious program and IRS targeting of Tea party from the beginning.
B) Obama and Holder are gay atheists.

Just like Fusion GPS, Perkins Cole and Marc Elias the general counsel for Kamala Harris’s 2020 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and John Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign did.

https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1139157716478439425
Precedent for foreign intelligence and using it against your opponent.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6047951269001/
1) Be a Democrat
2) Include it in a Dossier. Call it the Steele Dossier
3) Give it to John McCain.
3) McCain will take it to the FBI.
4) FBI will take it to the FISA court.
5) IC/DOJ/FBI will investigate your political opponent.

https://www.outsidethebeltway.com/trump-says-hed-accept-dirt-about-opponents-from-foreign-sources/
https://twitter.com/Integralmathyt/status/1139186447980802050

    I’m very curious about the faux outrage of the half-second. Is the proposition that information should be rejected because it comes from a foreign power? This reminds me of the theatrics when one country ‘learns’ that its allies spy on it.
    #ImpeachTrumpNow
    Every country collects information on friends and foes. It’s usually considered to be acting responsibly. But if the new way of running a country is to reject foreign intel because it’s foreign, I guess Congress had better repeal the national security act of 1947 (as amended),

    As far as the complaint about the President saying he maybe would inform the FBI of such information if he thought something was amiss, what’s the problem? The national intelligence program is designed to collect information and then to give it to the President.

    And, indeed, the relevant law explicitly mandates that these various agencies act pursuant to the control, authority and direction of the President to obtain information to give to the President so that he can use it to make such decisions as he thinks appropriate.

    The notion that a President who receives information has some kind of obligation to phone up his subordinates to tell them what it is so that they in the very next sentence inform the President of what the President just told them is quite inefficient. And idiotic.

    Welcome to America. We have a Constitution which vests executive power in exactly one person at a time. The chief executive does not report to department heads, officers or employees of the United States; they all answer to him.